Appeal No. 2005-1826 Application No. 10/210,046 Thus, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim 4 as being unpatentable over Kanter in view of Hamilton. SUMMARY As at least one rejection of each of the appealed claims is sustained, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-5, 7, 9 and 13-20 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007