Ex Parte POWERS et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-1893                                                                  Page 2                 
              Application No. 09/418,536                                                                                   



                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The appellants' invention relates in general to defibrillators, particularly automatic                
              or semi-automatic external defibrillators (specification, p. 1).  A copy of claims 1 to 16,                  
              18, 19 and 21 to 28 is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' supplemental brief.  A                   
              copy of claim 20 is set forth in the appendix to the examiner's answer.                                      


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                       
              appealed claims are:                                                                                         
              Powers et al. (Powers)                     5,879,374                    Mar. 9, 1999                         
              Rockwell et al. (Rockwell)                 6,141,584                    Oct. 31, 2000                        
              Skelton et al. (Skelton)                   6,292,692                    Sep. 18, 2001                        


                     Claims 1 to 12, 14 and 18 to 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                      
              anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Skelton.                        


                     Claims 4 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                            
              over Skelton in view of Rockwell.                                                                            


                     Claims 13, 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                    
              unpatentable over Skelton in view of Powers.                                                                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007