Appeal No. 2005-1893 Page 7
Application No. 09/418,536
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 12, 14 and 18 to
28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by or, in the alternative, under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Skelton is reversed; the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 4 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Skelton in
view of Rockwell is reversed; and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 13, 15
and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Skelton in view of Powers is
reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007