Ex Parte Schumacher - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2005-1904                                                        
          Application No. 10/041,075                                                  

          external cap made from ceramic.  It is appellant's contention               
          that the bottle and cap of Staples is made of glass, not the                
          claimed ceramic.  However, the examiner has submitted dictionary            
          definitions which establish that one of ordinary skill in the art           
          would consider glass a ceramic.  For example, The Condensed                 
          Chemical Dictionary (8th ed., Litton Educational Publishings,               
          Inc. 1971) states "[t]he chief major groups of the ceramics                 
          industry are as follows . . . (3) Glass products of all types."             
          Significantly, appellant has not refuted the definitions provided           
          by the examiner and we note, in particular, that appellant has              
          not submitted a Reply Brief in response to the analysis set forth           
          in the Examiner's Answer which demonstrates that glass is a                 
          ceramic.  Consequently, the examiner's position stands                      
          unrebutted.                                                                 
               As a final point, we note that appellant bases no argument             
          upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected               
          results, which would serve to rebut the inference of obviousness            
          established by the examiner.                                                





                                         -4-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007