Ex Parte Sugaya et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and         
                                                 is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                        Ex parte YOSHIO SUGAYA, HIROSHI TODA,                                                    
                                       YUKIO MATSUMURA, and HIROHISA KUBOTA                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                      Appeal No. 2005-1907                                                       
                                                   Application No. 09/909,898                                                    
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                  HEARD: September 15, 2005                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                           
               Before GARRIS, WARREN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This appeal involves claims 1-12 which are all the claims pending in the application.  We                  
               have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                    

















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007