Ex Parte Blaimschein et al - Page 1

                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            

                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                            Ex parte GOTTFRIED BLAIMSCHEIN                                                       
                                                     FRANZ HEIDLMAYER                                                            
                                                     Appeal No. 2005-1932                                                        
                                                  Application No. 10/191,311                                                     
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                             
               Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 9 to 15.1                       
               Claim 17, the only other claim pending in this application, has been allowed.                                     

                      We AFFIRM.                                                                                                 

                      1Claim 9 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.                                                    

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007