Ex Parte Thompson et al - Page 2




            Appeal No.  2005-2329                                                                          
            Application No. 09/738,293                                                                     

                  Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                                              
                  1.  (Previously Amended) A distributed application for facilitating                      
            collaboration between geographically-dispersed members of a team,                              
            comprising:                                                                                    
                  a collaboration services suite adapted to establish a communications                     
            session between two or more members of the team over at least a                                
            Switched Telephone Network (STN) in response to a request from any one                         
            of the team members using dynamic presence and availability information                        
            respecting each team member; and                                                               
                  a team member interface adapted to display the dynamic presence                          
            and availability information to each member of the team, and to enable a                       
            team member to request initiation by the collaboration services suite of a                     
            communications session with at least one other team member over at least                       
            the Switched Telephone Network (STN).                                                          
                  The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                  
            Tang et al. (Tang)              5,793,365                Aug. 11, 1998                         
            Klein et al. (Klein)            5,995,492                Nov. 30, 1999                         
            Appellants’ Prior Art           Specification            Page 32, lines 18-26                  
                  All claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                           
            evidence of obviousness as to claims 1-47, 49, 50, 53-58, 61 and 63-65,                        
            the examiner relies upon Tang in view of Klein, with the addition of                           


            Appellants’ admitted prior art, such as specification page 32, lines 18-26, as                 
                                                    -2-                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007