Ex Parte Bright et al - Page 2



                 Appeal No. 2005-2338                                                                                 
                 Application No. 09/754,001                                                                           

                                                     Invention                                                        

                        The invention relates to a system where a user of a service provider is                       
                 given a unique identifier.  As a result of the user having this unique identifier, the               
                 user is able to access several online services through an online service provider                    
                 without having to manage a logon id and password pair.  See page 8 of                                
                 appellants’ specification.                                                                           
                 Claim 1 is representative of the invention and is reproduced below:                                  
                 1.     A  method comprising:                                                                         
                        receiving a request from a client to access a subscribed online service of a                  
                 subscriber at an online service provider, said request comprising a globally                         
                 unique identifier (GUID) of the subscriber;                                                          
                        determining if the GUID is associated with the subscriber; and                                
                        facilitating access to the subscribed online service of the subscriber if the                 
                 GUID is associated with the subscriber.                                                              

                                                    References                                                        

                        The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                               
                 Teper et al. (Teper)               5,815,665           September 29, 1998                            
                 Strandberg                  US 2002/0161589 A1         October 31, 2002                              
                                                                        (filed September 15, 1998)                    
                                                 Rejection at Issue                                                   

                        Claims 1 through 4, 6, 9 through 13, 15 through 20, and 22 through 24                         
                 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Teper.  Claims 5, 7                     
                 through 8, 14 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                   
                 unpatentable over Teper in view of Strandberg.                                                       

                                                          2                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007