Appeal No. 2005-2338 Application No. 09/754,001 which requires the identity of the user be apparent to the service provider. The claims require that the request include the user/subscriber identifier; whether or not the service provider can directly interpret the identifier is not addressed in the claims. We find that Teper, in column 9, lines 50-55, discusses the initial communication with a service provider when the user “attempts to use the SP [service provider’s] service,” we consider an attempt to use a service to be a request. Teper teaches that this transmission includes a negotiate message which includes the user’s unique ID. Thus, we find that Teper teaches a request which includes a unique user/subscriber identifier as claimed. Lastly, on page 8 of the brief appellants state that: The law is also well settled that if there was anticipation, there should have been symmetry with infringement, “[t]hat which infringes if later, anticipates if earlier”, see e.g. Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 713 F.2d 760, 772, 218 USPQ 781 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert denied, 465, U.S. 1026 (1984). In other words, if Teper, in particular the cited passages have taught an element that anticipated the required element of claim 1, then Appellants should be able to find Teper, in particular, the cited passage infringing, had Teper been later than the application on appeal. However, no such infringement can be found in the cited passage. As Appellants has explained in a prior response, an infringing method must employ a GUID that uniquely identifies a user across all systems, all services, all communities and so forth. Since, Teper’s unique identifier is merely unique within Teper’s community, Teper does not infringe on Appellants’ claim. In response the examiner states “infringement is beyond the scope of examination.” We concur with the examiner. Initially, we find no quotation in Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. which states “that which infringes if later, anticipates if 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007