Appeal No. 2005-2462 Application No. 09/906,977 about 60% broken cells (column 7, lines 64-65). In addition, appellants’ specification discloses that “[t]he potato flakes comprise from about 5% to about 14%, preferably from about 5% to about 12%, more preferably from 6% to about 9%, and still more preferably from about 7% to about 8% moisture” (page 17, lines 10-12). Significantly, Villagran discloses the same moisture content of “preferably about 6% to about 9%, and more preferably from about 7% to about 8% moisture” (column 8, lines 44-46). Accordingly, based on the general correspondence between the physical properties for the dehydrated flakes of appellants and Villagran, we find that it is reasonable to place upon appellants the burden of establishing a patentable distinction between the presently claimed product and that disclosed by Villagran. This is eminently fair because the USPTO does not have the facilities and wherewithal to test prior art products, and it is particularly fair and reasonable in the present case inasmuch as both appellants and Villagran share the same assignee, the Proctor and Gamble Company. It would seem that no one is in a better position than appellants to place on this record the 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007