The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 89
By: Trial Section Merits Panel
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Filed: 16 September 2005
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 571-272-9797
Fax: 571-273-0042
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
______________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
______________________
PECHINEY EMBALLAGE FLEXIBLE EUROPE
Junior Party,
U.S. Patent 6,437,064
v.
CRYOVAC, INC.
Senior Party,
Application 08/996,367
Application 09/583,654
______________________
Patent Interference No. 105,092
______________________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER and
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.1
FINAL JUDGMENT - PRIORITY - Bd. R. 127(d)
1As part of the Board’s efforts under the Government Paperwork Elim ination Act, signatures on
papers originating from the Board are being phased out in favor of a com pletely electronic record.
Consequently, in this case papers originating at the Board will not have signatures. The signature
requirements for the parties have not changed. See e.g., 37 C.F.R. § 10.18.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007