Interference No. 105,092 Paper 89
Pechiney Em ballage Europe (Pechiney) v. Cryovac (Ahlgren) Page 2
Upon consideration of “PECHINEY REQUEST FOR ADVERSE JUDGMENT”
(Paper 76) and our “DECISION - REHEARING - Bd. R. 125(c)” (Paper 88), it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1, page 6), the sole
count in the interference, is awarded against junior party JOHN P. ECKSTEIN,
JOHNNY Q. ZHENG, MARK E. NORDNESS, KEITH D. LIND, GEORGE H.
WALBURN, MARY E. SHEPARD, GREGORY K. JONES and GREGORY J. SEEKE
(Pechiney);
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOHN P. ECKSTEIN, JOHNNY Q.
ZHENG, MARK E. NORDNESS, KEITH D. LIND, GEORGE H. WALBURN, MARY E.
SHEPARD, GREGORY K. JONES and GREGORY J. SEEKE (Pechiney) is not entitled
to a patent containing claims 1-3, 6-19 and 22-39 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S.
Patent No. 6,437,064;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party KELLY R. AHLGREN, ROBERT
BABROWICZ, SOLOMON BEKELE, BLAINE C. CHILDRESS, MARVIN R. HAVENS,
RONALD MOFFITT, GAUTAM P. SHAH and GEORGE WOFFORD (Cryovac) is not
entitled to a patent containing claims 1, 3-5, 7, 10-14 and 20-26 of application
09/583,654;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper, a copy of “ORDER – RULE
121(f)” (Paper 81) and a copy of “DECISION - REHEARING - Bd. R. 125(c)” (Paper 88)
shall be made of record in files of U.S. Patent No. 6,437,064 and U.S. applications
08/996,367 and 09/583,654; and
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007