The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is binding precedent of the Trial Procedures Section.
Paper 33
Filed by: Merits Panel
Mail Stop Interference Filed
P.O. Box 1450 14 June 2005
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 571-272-9797
Fax: 571-273-0042
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
PAUL J. SHUSTACK
Junior Party,
(Patent 6,014,488),
v.
DAVID M. SZUM, CHANDER P. CHAWLA, JAMES R. PETISCE
JOHN T. VANDEBERG, GEORGE PASTERNACK,
TIMOTHY E. BISHOP, PAUL E. SNOWWHITE,
EDWARD P. ZAHORA, and STEPHEN C. LAPIN
Senior Party,
(Application 09/757,533).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 105,228
_______________
Before: FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
1
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
1As part of Board efforts under the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, signatures
on papers originating from the Board are being phased out in favor of a completely electronic
record. Consequently, in this case papers originating at the Board will not have signatures. The
signature requirements for the parties have not changed. See, e.g., 37 C.F.R. § 10.18.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007