Goodchild v. Usman et al - Page 1




                                                 The opinion in support of the decision being                                            
                                              entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       
                                                                                                       Paper 29                         
                Filed by:       Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                               
                               Mail Stop Interference                                                                                   
                                P. O. Box 1450                                                                                           
                               Alexandria, VA  22313-1450                                                                               
                               Tel:  703-308-9797                                                                                       
                               Fax:  703-305-0942                                                                                       
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                  
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                                        JOHN GOODCHILD                                                                   
                                                             Junior Party,                                                               
                                                         (Patent 6,204,027),                                                             
                                                                   v.                                                                    
                                                         NASSIM USMAN,                                                                   
                                   ROBERT J. CEDERGREN, JEAN-PIERRE PERREAULT,                                                           
                                           JING-HUA YANG, and ALEXANDER RICH                                                             
                                                             Senior Party,                                                               
                                                      (Application 10/102,094).                                                          
                                                           ______________                                                                
                                                   Patent Interference No. 105,126                                                       
                                                          _______________                                                                
                Before: TORCZON, SPIEGEL, and LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                LANE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                       

                                                      JUDGMENT-RULE 640                                                                  
                        Goodchild has not responded to the order to show cause why judgment should not be                                
                entered against it within the time set.  (Paper 28).  Accordingly, it is appropriate to enter                            







Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007