The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 29 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Mail Stop Interference P. O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ JOHN GOODCHILD Junior Party, (Patent 6,204,027), v. NASSIM USMAN, ROBERT J. CEDERGREN, JEAN-PIERRE PERREAULT, JING-HUA YANG, and ALEXANDER RICH Senior Party, (Application 10/102,094). ______________ Patent Interference No. 105,126 _______________ Before: TORCZON, SPIEGEL, and LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. LANE, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT-RULE 640 Goodchild has not responded to the order to show cause why judgment should not be entered against it within the time set. (Paper 28). Accordingly, it is appropriate to enterPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007