Goodchild v. Usman et al - Page 2




                judgment against Goodchild.  37 CFR § 1.640(e).                                                                          
                        Upon consideration of the record and for reasons given, it is                                                    
                                ORDERED that judgment on priority is entered against junior party JOHN                                   
                GOODCHILD;                                                                                                               
                                FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOHN GOODCHILD is not entitled to a                                    
                patent containing claims 3 through 16 of it's 6,204,027 patent which correspond to the sole count                        
                in the interference;                                                                                                     
                                FURTHER ORDERED that, if there is a settlement agreement, the parties'                                   
                attention is directed to 35 USC § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661; and                                                         
                                FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be given a paper number and                                 
                be entered into the administrative record of patent 6,204,027 and application 10/102,094.                                



                                        ______________________________ )                                                                 
                                        RICHARD TORCZON                                 )                                                
                                        Administrative Patent Judge                     )                                                
                                                                                        )                                                
                                                                                        )                                                
                                        ______________________________ ) BOARD OF PATENT                                                 
                                        CAROL A. SPIEGEL                                )   APPEALS AND                                  
                                        Administrative Patent Judge                     )  INTERFERENCES                                 
                                                                                        )                                                
                                                                                        )                                                
                                        ______________________________ )                                                                 
                                        SALLY GARDNER LANE                              )                                                
                                        Administrative Patent Judge                     )                                                






                                                                   2                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007