judgment against Goodchild. 37 CFR § 1.640(e). Upon consideration of the record and for reasons given, it is ORDERED that judgment on priority is entered against junior party JOHN GOODCHILD; FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOHN GOODCHILD is not entitled to a patent containing claims 3 through 16 of it's 6,204,027 patent which correspond to the sole count in the interference; FURTHER ORDERED that, if there is a settlement agreement, the parties' attention is directed to 35 USC § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661; and FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be given a paper number and be entered into the administrative record of patent 6,204,027 and application 10/102,094. ______________________________ ) RICHARD TORCZON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ______________________________ ) BOARD OF PATENT CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ______________________________ ) SALLY GARDNER LANE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007