The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JASON GOLDENBERG
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1063
Application No. 10/126,910
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to appellant’s request for rehearing
of our decision mailed June 24, 2005, wherein we affirmed the
examiner's rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the combined teachings of Jelling (U.S.
3,181,773) and Paulsen (U.S. 5,950,818). Claim 1 is the only
claim pending in the application.
We have carefully considered each of the points of argument
raised by appellant in the request for rehearing, however, those
arguments do not persuade us that we overlooked or misapprehended
any points raised in the appeal, or that our merits based
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007