Appeal No. 2005-1063
Application No. 10/126,910
In this case, we have concluded that the combined teachings of
the applied references would have suggested the subject matter of
claim 1 on appeal to those of ordinary skill in the art at the
time of appellant’s invention.
In light of the foregoing, appellant’s request is granted to
the extent of reconsidering our decision mailed June 24, 2005,
but is denied with respect to making any changes therein.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
DENIED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF/jrg
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007