Interference No. 105,155 Paper 221
Novozym es v. Genencor Page 2
1 I. Order
2 In view of the “DECISION - PRIORITY - Bd.R. 125(a)” (Paper 220) and for the
3 reasons given therein, it is
4 ORDERED that priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1, p. 6), the sole count in the
5 interference, is awarded against junior party GRETHE RASMUSSEN, JAN MOLLER
6 MIKKELSEN, MARTIN SCHÜLEIN, SHAMKANT ANANT PATKAR, FRED HAGEN,
7 CARSTEN MAILAND HJORT and SVEN HASTRUP (Novozymes) (see concurrent
8 judgment);
9 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party GRETHE RASMUSSEN, JAN MOLLER
10 MIKKELSEN, MARTIN SCHÜLEIN, SHAMKANT ANANT PATKAR, FRED HAGEN,
11 CARSTEN MAILAND HJORT and SVEN HASTRUP (Novozymes) is not entitled to a
12 patent;
13 FURTHER ORDERED that senior party KATHLEEN A. CLARKSON, EDWARD
14 LARENAS, SHARON SHOEMAKER and GEOFFREY L. WEISS (Genencor) is not
15 entitled to a patent containing claims 1-7 of U.S. Patent 6,107,265;
16 FURTHER ORDERED that senior party KATHLEEN A. CLARKSON, EDWARD
17 LARENAS, SHARON SHOEMAKER and GEOFFREY L. WEISS (Genencor) is not
18 entitled to a patent containing claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent 6,162,782;
19 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the
20 files of U.S. application 09/735,787 and U.S. Patents 6,162,782 and 6,107,265; and
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007