Interference No. 105,155 Paper 221 Novozym es v. Genencor Page 3 1 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not 2 been filed, attention is further directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 41.205. 3 ) 4 \ss\ Jameson Lee ) 5 JAMESON LEE ) 6 Administrative Patent Judge ) 7 ) 8 ) 9 \ss\ Carol A. Spiegel ) BOARD OF PATENT 10 CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) APPEALS AND )) INTERFERENCES 11 Adminstrative Patent Judge 12 ) 13 ) 14 \ss\ James T. Moore ) 15 JAMES T. MOORE 16 Administrative Patent Judge 17 cc (via overnight mail): 18 Counsel for Novozymes: 19 Joseph R. Robinson, Esq. 20 Robert Schaffer, Esq. 21 Samuel S. Woodley, Ph.D., Esq. 22 DARBY & DARBY P.C. 23 805 Third Avenue 24 New York, New York 10022-7513 25 Counsel for Genencor: 26 R. Danny Huntington, Esq. 27 Bruce J. Boggs, Jr., Esq. 28 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 29 2020 K Street, NW 30 Washington, DC 20006-1806Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007