1 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the files of Henkel’s 2 involved U.S. Application Nos. 09/446,434 and 09/446,578 and in P&G’s involved U.S. Patent 3 No. 6,399,564. 4 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is any settlement agreement which has not been 5 filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 C.F.R. § 41.205. 6 7 /ss/ William F. Pate, III ) 8 WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) 9 Administrative Patent Judge ) 10 ) 11 ) 12 ) 13 /ss/ Sally C. Medley ) BOARD OF PATENT 14 SALLY C. MEDLEY ) APPEALS 15 Administrative Patent Judge ) AND 16 ) INTERFERENCES 17 ) 18 ) 19 /ss/ Michael P. Tierney ) 20 MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) 21 Administrative Patent Judge ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007