1 Junior Party Bedilion has filed a request for adverse judgment as to Count 1, the sole
1
2 count in interference. (Paper No. 10). Specifically, Bedilion states:
3 Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.127(b)(4), the Junior Party Bedilion hereby notifies the
4 Board of Bedilion’s abandonment of the contest in the above-captioned
5 interference. In other words, Bedilion hereby requests entry of adverse judgment
6 with respect to claims 1-30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,420,114 and claims 1-30 of U.S.
7 Patent No. 6,613,529, i.e., all Bedilion claims designated as corresponding to
8 Count 1, the sole count in this interference.
9 (Paper No. 10, p. 2).
10 It is:
11 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the sole count in interference, is
12 awarded against Junior Party Bedilion.
13 FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Bedilion is not entitled to a patent containing
14 claims 1-30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,420,114 and claims 1-30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,613,529, all of
15 which correspond to Count 1.
16 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the files of
17 U.S. Application No. 10/639,696, U.S. Patent No. 6,420,114, and U.S. Patent No. 6,613,529.
1We note that the caption on Bedilions request for interference incorrectly identified Bedilion as a coinventor of the ‘696
application and Besemer as a coinventor of the ‘114 and ‘529 patents. Bedilion’s real party in interest statement (Paper
No. 9) and Bedilion’s designation of lead counsel do not contain this caption error.
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007