1 FURTHER ORDERED that should there be a settlement agreement, the parties’ 2 attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. §135(c) and 37 Bd. R. 205. 3 /Sally C. Medley/ ) 4 SALLY C. MEDLEY ) 5 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) 6 ) 7 ) 8 /Michael P. Tierney/ ) BOARD OF PATENT 9 MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) APPEALS AND 10 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) INTERFERENCES 11 ) 12 ) 13 /James T. Moore/ ) 14 JAMES T. MOORE ) 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) 16 cc (electronic filing): 17 Counsel for BEDILION: 18 Patricia A. Schreck, Esq. 19 INCYTE CORPORATION 20 Rt. 141 & Henry Clay Road 21 Building E336 22 Wilmington, DE 19880 23 pschreck@incyte.com 24 Counsel for BESEMER: 25 Oliver R. Ashe, Jr., Esq. 26 GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC 27 1950 Roland Clarke Place 28 Reston, VA 20191 29 oashe@gbpatent.com 30 ekenehan@gbpatent.com 31 phil_mcgarrigle@affymetrix.com -3-Page: Previous 1 2 3Last modified: November 3, 2007