Ex Parte Rosenberg et al - Page 25



             Appeal No. 2005-0642                                                                               
             Application No. 09/568,278                                                                         

                                                      (5)                                                       
                                               Ex parte Eggert                                                  
                   The opinion in Ex parte Eggert, 67 USPQ2d 1716 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int.                         
             2003), issued as a precedential opinion, is also part of the recapture precedent                   
             applicable to proceedings before the United States Patent & Trademark Office                       
             (USPTO).  Eggert was entered on May 29, 2003, prior to the Federal Circuit’s                       
             North American Container decision.  In Eggert, the majority stated that “[i]n our                  
             view, the surrendered subject matter is the outer circle of Drawing 1 [the rejected                
             claim prior to the amendment that resulted in the claim being issued] because it is                
             the subject matter appellants conceded was unpatentable.”  67 USPQ2d at 1717.                      
             The majority further held that “in our view” subject matter narrower than the                      
             rejected claim but broader than the patented claim is not barred by the recapture                  
             rule.  Id.  The majority explained that if the finally rejected claim was ABC and the              
             patent claim was ABCDEF, there would be recapture for ABC or anything broader                      
             than ABC, but not for claims directed to ABCX, ABCDBr, ABCEF, or ABrBCDEF,                         
             because those claims would be narrower than the finally rejected claim ABC.  67                    
             USPQ2d at 1717.  In its opinion, the majority recognized that the Federal Circuit                  
             had held that “the mere presence of narrowing limitations in the reissue claim is                  

                                                     - 25 -                                                     




Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007