Appeal 2005-0801
Application 09/848,628
(1) First, applicants rewrote original application claim
6 as original application claim 21 to include the limitation of “a reinforcing
groove [85] centrally located in said hood portion [76] at a right angle to
said perforated plate [78]” (reference numbers added); application claim 21
ultimately became patent claim 1.
(2) Second, applicants rewrote original application
claims 3, 7, and 13, as original application claims 22, 24, and 25,
respectively, to include the limitation of “at least one L shaped retainer
member [79] to hold said hood [54] to said abutment surface [75]”
(reference numbers added); application claims 22, 24, and 25, ultimately
became patent claims 2, 4, and 5, respectively.
(3) Third, applicants cancelled original application
claim 9 which claimed “wherein said perforated false bottom is hingedly
connected to said hollow body."
EXAMINER'S REJECTION BASED ON PRIOR ART
78. The Examiner has rejected reissue application claims 8-
13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the following prior art
in Reissue application final office action dated April 17, 2002 (Reissue Final
action 3-4):
(1) Schafer et al. (Schafer), U.S. Patent 5,031,796 in
view of
(2) Matry, U.S. Patent 3,342,368.
22
Page: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007