Ex Parte KRAUS - Page 52



          Appeal No. 2005-0841                                                        
          Application No. 08/230,083                                                  

               According to the principles set forth by the Federal                   
          Circuit, if the reissue claims are as broad in all aspects as               
          the claims prior to the amendment, then the recapture rule bars             
          the claims.  As stated supra, the addition of a limitation to               
          overcome a prior art rejection suggests an admission that the               
          scope of the claim prior to the amendment is unpatentable.                  
          Therefore, if all limitations of the reissue claim are at least             
          as broad as the claim prior to the amendment, then the recapture            
          rule bars the claim.  Additionally, if the reissue claim is at              
          least as broad in an aspect related to a prior art rejection                
          (i.e., the limitation added to overcome the reference), even if             
          narrower in an aspect unrelated to the prior art rejection, then            
          the recapture rule bars the claims.  In other words, completely             
          eliminating a limitation added to overcome a prior art rejection,           
          even if accompanied by a narrowing in another area, is barred by            
          the recapture rule.                                                         
               However, if the reissue claims are narrower in all aspects             
          (including the limitation added to overcome the reference) or in            
          an aspect related to a prior art rejection (i.e., with regard to            
          the limitation added to overcome the reference), even if broader            
          in other areas, then the recapture rule does not apply.  Thus, a            
          narrowing of the claim in the area of the limitation that                   



                                        -52-                                          



Page:  Previous  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007