Appeal No. 2005-1109
Application No. 09/781,733
plurality of cushioning products manufactured in a set period of time as required
by claim 6. Nor do we find the step of storing cumulative length of a plurality of
cushioning products as required by claim 20, 21 or 22. Thus, Ratzel fails to
anticipate claims 6-11,13, 15-24 and 27-32.
While we agree with the examiner that McLean discloses a general
purpose PC-type computer with RAM and hard drive memory, the disclosure
thereof cannot ameliorate the deficiencies of the Ratzel reference. Thus, the
combined teachings fail to establish the prima facie obviousness of the claims
rejected under section 103.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007