Ex Parte BURTON et al - Page 12


                 Appeal No.  2005-1344                                                         Page 12                   
                 Application No.  08/468,610                                                                             
                        the claim recites that the resin is electrostatically uncharged at the                           
                        pH where the target protein or peptide is resin bound, regardless of                             
                        whether the medium is at a high or a low ionic strength.  In other                               
                        words, less than 5% of the resin’s ionizable functional groups are                               
                        ionized at a high ionic strength at a binding pH; and, less than 5%                              
                        of the resin’s ionizable functional groups are ionized at a low ionic                            
                        strength at a binding pH.                                                                        
                 The examiner finds, however, “the specification at page 18 defines ‘high’ ionic                         
                 strength as greater than 250 millimolar.  However, that limitation does not appear                      
                 in the claims under examination.  On the current record the term ‘high’ can be                          
                 construed to encompass any concentration which is higher than another.”                                 
                        In our opinion, neither the appellants’ nor the examiner appear to have                          
                 interpreted this limitation correctly.  According to appellants’ specification (page                    
                 5), “[t]he resins described herein are further characterized as being capable of                        
                 binding the target protein or peptide from a solution maintained at either high or                      
                 low ionic strength.”  At page 18 of their specification appellants define the                           
                 terms “high ionic strength” and “low ionic strength” as follows:                                        
                        The term “high ionic strength” means an ionic strength greater than                              
                        or equal to that required to provide a conductivity of 4.7 millimho                              
                        (milliSeimens (mS/cm2)).  For example, such conductivity can be                                  
                        reached by using 250 millimolar (mM) sodium chloride.  The term                                  
                        “low ionic strength” means an ionic strength less than 4.7 millimho.                             
                 We understand from page 18 of appellants’ specification in their related                                
                 application (Application No. 08/654,937, Appeal No. 2005-1443), as amended by                           
                 the Paper received July 20, 1995,9 that a conductivity of 4.7 millimho                                  
                 corresponds to a 42 millimolar sodium chloride solution.  Accordingly, we                               
                 understand the term “high ionic strength” to mean an ionic strength equal to, or                        
                                                                                                                         
                 9 We note that a similar amendment to page 18 of the specification was not made in this                 
                 application.                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007