Ex Parte KOPPOLU et al - Page 22




                  Appeal No. 2005-1431                                                                                                                         
                  Application 09/442,070                                                                                                                       

                            Subsequent to the filing of the Supplemental Reply, the Federal Circuit addressed the                                              
                  requirements for an incorporation by reference in Cook Biotech, Inc. v. ACell, Inc., 460 F.3d                                                
                  1365, 79 USPQ2d 1865 (Fed. Cir. 2006).  Cook Biotech was an appeal from the district court's                                                 
                  denial of post-trial motions pertaining to claim construction, infringement, and the adequacy of                                             
                  the jury verdict form subsequent to a jury finding that ACell, Inc.'s ("ACell's") commercial                                                 
                  product, ACellVetTM, infringed U.S. Patent 5,554,389 ("the '389 patent").  One of the questions                                              
                  before the Federal Circuit was whether ACell was correct to argue that the claim language "the                                               
                  luminal portion of the tunica mucosa" should be given the definition it has in Patent No.                                                    
                  4,902,508 ("the '508 patent"), which is the subject of the following incorporation-by-reference                                              
                  passage in the '389 patent:                                                                                                                  
                                     The preparation of UBS from a segment of urinary bladder is                                                               
                            similar to the procedure for preparing intestinal submucosa detailed in                                                            
                            U.S. Pat. No. 4,902,508, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated                                                         
                            herein by reference.  A segment of urinary bladder tissue is first subjected                                                       
                            to abrasion using a longitudinal wiping motion to remove both the outer                                                            
                            layers (particularly the abluminal smooth muscle layers) and the luminal                                                           
                            portions of the tunica mucosa layers--the epithelial layers).  The resulting                                                       
                            submucosa tissue has a thickness of about 80 micrometers, and consists                                                             
                            primarily (greater than 98%) of a cellular, eosinophilic staining (H&E                                                             
                            stain) extracellular matrix material.  Occasional blood vessels and spindle                                                        
                            cells consistent with fibrocytes are scattered randomly throughout the                                                             
                            tissue. . . .                                                                                                                      



                                                                                                                                                               
                  district court correctly held that structure supporting a means-plus-function claim under § 112,                                             
                  ¶ 6 must appear in the specification," id. at 1381, 53 USPQ2d at 1229, which the Federal Circuit                                             
                  construed for § 112, ¶ 6 purposes as not including subject matter incorporated by reference into                                             
                  the specification.  Id. at 1382, 53 USPQ2d at 1230-31.                                                                                       
                                                                             22                                                                                





Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007