Ex Parte KOPPOLU et al - Page 32




                  Appeal No. 2005-1431                                                                                                                         
                  Application 09/442,070                                                                                                                       

                  Bailey application was incorporated by reference into a Hostettler application relied on by the                                              
                  examiner as anticipatory prior art.33  The incorporating language at issue read as follows:                                                  
                                     The above-described siloxane-oxyalkylene block copolymers can be                                                          
                            prepared in accordance with the procedures described and claimed in the                                                            
                            copending application of D. L. Bailey and F. M. O'Conner, Serial No. 417,935,                                                      
                            filed December 14, 1953.                                                                                                           
                  455 F.2d at 603, 170 USPQ at 217.  Based on the manner in which Hostettler described the                                                     
                  invention, the court held that a person skilled in the art would have understood the phrase "[t]he                                           
                  above-described siloxane-oxyalkylene block copolymers" to be referring to material in Bailey                                                 
                  which does not include Example I(a).  Id.                                                                                                    
                            Nor is any specific guidance on the question before us provided by Hawkins, In re Voss,                                            
                  557 F.2d 812, 816-17, 194 USPQ 267, 269-70 (CCPA 1977), or In re Hughes, 550 F.2d 1273,                                                      
                  193 USPQ 141 (CCPA 1977), all decided after Saunders.34                                                                                      

                                                                                                                                                               
                  at 674, 177 USPQ at 146 ("To be sure, the statement that an application is a continuation-in-part,                                           
                  or a continuation, or a division, or in part a continuation of another application is in a broad                                             
                  sense a 'reference' to the earlier application, but a mere reference to another application, or                                              
                  patent, or publication is not an incorporation of anything therein into the application containing                                           
                  such reference for the purposes of the disclosure required by 35 U.S.C. 112.").                                                              
                            33   The court phrased the issue this way: "The section 102 rejection in this case can be                                          
                  sustained only on the theory that Hostettler expressly incorporates a particular part of Bailey by                                           
                  reference."  444 F.2d at 602, 170 USPQ at 216.  This is apparently the basis for Advanced                                                    
                  Display's characterization of Saunders as "reasoning that a rejection for anticipation is                                                    
                  appropriate only if one reference 'expressly incorporates a particular part' of another reference."                                          
                  212 F.3d at 1282, 54 USPQ2d at 1680.                                                                                                         
                            34   Hawkins involved the following incorporation by reference language:  "These novel                                             
                  compounds may for example be used in the production of valuable monomers for example by the                                                  
                  processes described in copending British applications 36107/66, 42756/66, 46971/66, 49699/66,                                                
                  (Continued on next page.)                                                                                                                    
                                                                             32                                                                                





Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007