Appeal No. 2005-1629 Application No. 10/001,256 OPINION The examiner finds that JP ‘525 discloses ink jet ink compositions comprising water, glycol ether, pigment, a polymer dispersant, and a polymer emulsion prepared by sulfonating diene- based polymers with a sulfonating agent such as sulfuric acid or sulfuric anhydride (Answer, page 4). The examiner also finds that Anton discloses ink jet ink compositions comprising water, pigment, a polymeric dispersant, and a polymer emulsion obtained from sulfonyl group containing monomers (Answer, page 5). Although the examiner admits that there is no disclosure of an ink cartridge in JP ‘525 or Anton, the examiner finds that it “is clear that an ink jet printer would inherently contain the ink in an ink cartridge prior to printing” (Answer, pages 4 and 5). The examiner also finds that the difference between the primary references (JP ‘525 and Anton) and the claimed subject matter is the requirement in the claims on appeal for the specific penetrating agent of a combination of acetylene glycol (formula (1)) and triethylene glycol monobutyl ether (id.). Accordingly, the examiner applies Sano as the secondary reference for its teaching of a preferred ink jet ink penetrating agent that is a combination of acetylene glycol and triethylene glycol monobutyl ether (Answer, pages 5-6). From these findings, the examiner 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007