The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MARC TREMBLAY and WILLIAM JOY ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1800 Application No. 09/204,479 ____________ HEARD: October 19, 2005 ____________ Before DIXON, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3 through 17, 19 through 21, 23, and 24, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to instruction execution by a processor. In particular, a functional unit executes an instruction that operates on multiple registers in a register file, one of which is explicitly identified and another of which is implicitly identified based on the explicitly identified register. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007