Appeal No. 2005-1817 Page 4
Application No. 09/834,499
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Iijima in view of Takagi and further in view of
Weber.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Iijima in view of Takagi, Weber, and further in
view of Flanagan.
Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Iijima in view of Takagi, Weber, Flanagan and
further in view of Hansen.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Iijima in view of Takagi, Weber and Flanagan,
and further in view of Dodd.
Claims 14 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Iijima in view of Takagi, and further in
view of Bryant.
Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Iijima in view of Takagi, Weber, Flanagan,
Hansen, Dodd and further in view of Bryant.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by
the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted
rejections, we make reference to the answer (mailed December 29,
2004) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007