The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KEITH HOMER BAKER, MICHAEL PETER SIKLOSKI,
HENRY CHENG NA, JANINE MORGENS STRANG, WILLIAM MICHAEL SCHEPER,
EUGENE STEVEN SADLOWSKI and VINCENT JOHN BECKS
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-1827
Application No. 10/227,761
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 76
to 86, the only pending claims. (Brief, p. 2). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007