Ex Parte Baker et al - Page 2




                Appeal No. 2005-1827                                                                                                         
                Application No. 10/227,761                                                                                                   


                                                            BACKGROUND                                                                       
                        The present invention relates to compositions that are disclosed to be                                               
                suitable for treating shoes.  According to the specification page 8, treating                                                
                compositions is meant to encompass generally benefit agent compositions.                                                     
                Benefit agents is meant to encompass any agent that can impart a consumer                                                    
                recognizable and/or measurable benefit to an article.  A copy of the claims on                                               
                appeal appears in the appendix attached to Appellants’  Brief.                                                               
                        The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting the appealed                                            
                claims.                                                                                                                      
                Murch et al. (Murch)                      H1513                   Jan.  2, 1996                                              
                (U.S.  Statutory Invention Registration)                                                                                     
                Angell et al. (Angell)                    5,795,854             Aug. 18, 1998                                                
                Lesko et al. (Lesko)                      5,820,633             Oct. 13, 1998                                                
                Siegler et al. (Siegler)                  4,784,664             Nov. 15, 1988                                                
                Hartshorn                                 WO 95/32268        Nov. 30, 1995                                                   
                (Published World Intell. Prop. Org. Patent Application)                                                                      
                Goderis et al. (Goderis)                  WO 98/00512             Jan.  8, 1998                                              
                (Published World Intell. Prop. Org. Patent Application)                                                                      
                        The Examiner has entered the following grounds of rejection (Answer                                                  
                pages 3 and 4) as presented below in roman numeral fashion:                                                                  


                                                                     2                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007