Ex Parte Dolnik et al - Page 8



             Appeal No.  2005-1918                                                              Παγε 8               
             Application No. 09/946,396                                                                              
             to overcome the prima facie case of anticipation.  The rejection of claims 1 and 2 under                
             35 U.S.C. § 102 (b) as anticipated by Gebert is affirmed.                                               
             Obviousness                                                                                             
                    The examiner rejected claims 1-5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as unpatentable                       
             over Gebert and Bayerlein.                                                                              
                    In responding to the examiner’s rejection, appellants merely reiterate their                     
             arguments regarding Gebert.  We find these arguments to be unpersuasive for the                         
             reasons discussed above.  The rejection of claims 1-5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is                          
             affirmed.                                                                                               






























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007