Appeal No. 2005-1949
Application No. 09/829,168
The rejection (D) of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as
being unpatentable as obvious over the Admitted Prior Art as
applied in Rejection A, further in view of Gil is reversed.
The rejection (E) of claims 1 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. §102(b)
as anticipated by, or alternatively under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as
obvious over, Meyer is sustained.
The rejection (F) of claims 3-5, 11, and 12 under 35 U.S.C.
§103(a) as being unpatentable as obvious over the disclosure of
Meyer is sustained.
The rejection (G) of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as
being unpatentable over Meyer as applied in Rejection E, further
in view of Gil is sustained.
The rejection (H) of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as
being unpatentable over Meyer as applied in Rejection E, further
in view of Fujimoro is sustained.
23
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007