Appeal No. 2005-2207 Page 10 Application No. 09/548,933 on any of the ‘diseases of hyperexcitability’” (Answer, page 10) is insufficient to overcome the examiner’s initial burden. We conclude that the specification discloses an asserted utility for the claimed nucleic acids which is both substantial and specific, as required by 35 U.S.C. § 101, and the examiner has not provided evidence sufficient to establish that one of ordinary skill in the art would reasonably doubt that asserted utility. We therefore reverse the rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101, and the corresponding rejection under § 112, first paragraph. REVERSED Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Demetra J. Mills ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007