Ex Parte Ittycheriah et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
                        Ex parte Abraham P. Ittycheriah, Stephane H. Maes, and Jan Sedivy                            
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                Appeal No. 2005-2282                                                 
                                              Application No. 09/505,807                                             
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
             Before RUGGIERO, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                    A patent examiner rejected claims 1 and 3-27.  The appellants appeal therefrom                   
             under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We affirm-in-part.                                                           


                                                 I. BACKGROUND                                                       
                    The invention at issue on appeal manages the sharing of audio data between                       
             speech technologies.  In many speech/audio processing systems, explain the                              
             appellants, audio data or processed speech data are stored in buffers for consumption                   
             and processing by speech engines.  They add that the conventional speech/audio                          
             processing systems, however, typically do not include mechanism for managing the                        
             consumption of data from the buffers.  (Spec. at 1.)                                                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007