The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte Abraham P. Ittycheriah, Stephane H. Maes, and Jan Sedivy ____________ Appeal No. 2005-2282 Application No. 09/505,807 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before RUGGIERO, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. A patent examiner rejected claims 1 and 3-27. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We affirm-in-part. I. BACKGROUND The invention at issue on appeal manages the sharing of audio data between speech technologies. In many speech/audio processing systems, explain the appellants, audio data or processed speech data are stored in buffers for consumption and processing by speech engines. They add that the conventional speech/audio processing systems, however, typically do not include mechanism for managing the consumption of data from the buffers. (Spec. at 1.)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007