Appeal No. 2005-2439 Application No. 09/754,378 his invention. We agree with the examiner that the artisan would have been motivated to use the Internet as the interactive network in Von Kohorn because the Internet has become accessible to nearly everyone who owns a personal computer and the Internet has become the wide area network of choice by such computer users. Thus, applying the teachings of Saigh to Von Kohorn does not render Von Kohorn inoperable for its intended purpose, but only makes an additional form of communication available to the coupon distributors. With respect to the third argument noted above, appellants simply recite the various limitations of independent claim 76, and then assert with essentially no explanation or analysis that the portions of Von Kohorn cited by the examiner fail to teach the claim limitations [brief, pages 20-22]. The examiner responds by again citing several portions of Von Kohorn which, according to the examiner, meet the individual recitations of claim 76 [answer, pages 21-34]. Appellants respond that the rejection fails to show the following elements of claim 76: 1) storing the electronic coupon data at an Internet accessible location; 2) receiving a request for coupon data at the central location; 3) determining at the Internet accessible location 13Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007