The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HUI-JUNG WU and JAMES S. DRAGE ____________ Appeal No. 2005-2522 Application No. 09/841,453 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, KRATZ and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is in response to appellants’ request for rehearing of our May 31, 2006 decision, which request was filed on June 28, 2006. In that decision, we affirmed the examiner’s decision to reject claims 2-16, 18-21 and 31-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jin in view of Grainger and Kotelnikov; to reject claims 22-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jin in view of Grainger and Kotelnikov; to reject claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jin in view of Grainger, Kotelnikov and Burns; and to reject claims 2-29 and 31-34 under the judicially created doctrine ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007