Appeal No. 2005-2522 Page 5
Application No. 09/841,453
length corresponding to those disclosed as useful by appellants,
as we noted at page 8 of our Decision.
Accordingly, appellants’ request does not persuade us that
our May 31, 2006 Decision was in error in any respect.
For the above reasons, appellants’ request for rehearing is
granted to the extent that we have reconsidered our decision, but
is denied with respect to making any change thereto.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
REQUEST FOR REHEARING - DENIED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JAMES T. MOORE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
PFK/sld
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007