Ex Parte 5832461 et al - Page 35



              Appeal No. 2005-2642                                                                                            
              Reexamination Control No. 90/005,841                                                                            

              Action at 15-16,           ¶¶ 25-27.  The rejections of claims 24 and 36 based on                               
              Mukherjee in view of Musmanno have been affirmed for the reasons given above.                                   
                      Claim 31 specifies that the principal component of the deposit account is “retired                      
              over a plurality of iteration periods in the account term by payments to the depositor in                       
              each iteration period.”16  Because the payout is recited as being retired “over a plurality                     
              of iteration periods,” the examiner is correct to conclude that this claim recites the                          
              payout characteristic of an annuity.  Final Action at 15, ¶ 25.  Appellant does not                             
              contend otherwise.  For this payout feature, the examiner relies on Bodie, which is                             
              concerned with how to generate retirement income that is protected against inflation.                           
              Bodie, following a brief discussion (at 5, para. bridging cols. 1-2) of the unsatisfactory                      
              performance of equity-based variable annuities (VA’s) based on common stocks,                                   
              explains that what is needed is a “purchasing power annuity (PPA).”  After noting that                          
              PPA’s in the form of inflation-indexed government bonds are available, Bodie’s                                  
              summarizes his own, alternate proposal for a PPA:                                                               
                             At first glance, the only asset that appears capable of providing a                              
                      base for such an annuity would be default-free bonds linked to some index                               
                      of the cost of living.  Although proposals for the U.S. government or some                              
                      other institution to issue such price-indexed bonds have abounded, there                                
                      is no indication that anyone with the power and authority to implement any                              
                      of these proposals in inclined to do so.                                                                
                             Given the apparent reluctance, it not outright opposition, on the part                           
                      of government and private corporations to the issuance of price-indexed                                 
                      bonds, the relevant question is whether we can find any other asset, or                                 
                      combination of assets, currently existing in [begin page 6, first column] the                           
                      U.S. financial system that could fulfill the same function.  The empirical                              
                                                                                                                             
                      16  This claim does not specify how the deposit accrual component is paid out.                          

                                                             35                                                               





Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007