Ex Parte 5832461 et al - Page 36



              Appeal No. 2005-2642                                                                                            
              Reexamination Control No. 90/005,841                                                                            

                      evidence developed below suggests that the most promising asset base                                    
                      for PPA’s is short-term bonds hedged against unanticipated inflation with a                             
                      small position in a well-diversified portfolio of commodity futures contracts.                          
              Id. at 5, 2d col. through page 6, 1st col. (footnotes omitted).  The examiner explains his                      
              reliance on Bodie as follows:                                                                                   
                      BODIE suggests a “purchasing power annuity” which is linked to the cost                                 
                      of living (page 5, col. 2).  It would have been obvious . . . at the time of the                        
                      invention to employ an index linked account as taught by MUKHERERJEE                                    
                      et al. and MUSAMANNO et al. in conjunction with an annuity payout in                                    
                      order to hedge retirement income against inflation, as suggested by the                                 
                      explicit balancing of index-linked deposits with index[-]linked obligations                             
                      (page 50 of MUKH) using a ubiquitous and popular financial retirement                                   
                      savings and payout format: annuities.                                                                   
                                                                                                                             
              Final Action at 15 (underlining omitted).  The examiner’s reliance on Bodie as disclosing                       
              “a ‘purchasing power annuity’ which is linked to the cost of living (page 5, col. 2)” makes                     
              it clear that he is relying on Bodie’s discussion of the desirability of implementing PPA’s                     
              as annuities in the form of (unavailable) default-free government or corporate bonds                            
              linked to some index of the cost of living.  Appellant is therefore incorrect (Brief at 17-20;                  
              Reply brief at 8) to treat the rejection as based on Bodie’s proposed PPA’s which rely                          
              on a combination of short-term bonds and commodity futures contracts, which PPA’s                               
              are not mentioned in the part of Bodie cited by the examiner: page 6, second column.                            
              In fact, this error was pointed out by the examiner in responding to same argument in                           
              appellant’s “Response to Office Action Dated July 25, 2001,”   at 9.  The examiner                              
              stated: “[T]he part of BODIE relied upon is not the part Applicant has referenced.  It                          
              would have been obvious to revert to the prior art.  Although BODIE claims to have a                            


                                                             36                                                               





Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007