Ex Parte Gasseling - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-2646                                                                                                               
              Application No. 09/948,377                                                                                                         


                     1.  An oil filter for cooling oil comprising: circular fins permanently incorporated                                        
              and limited to the top of an oil filter, wherein said circular fins are 360 degrees starting in                                    
              the center and increasing in diameter to the outer top edge, wherein said circular fins                                            
              are rectangular in shape from bottom to top.                                                                                       
              The references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting claim 1 are:                                                     
              Mitterer     2,191,490  Feb. 27, 1940                                                                                              
              Bartalone et al. (Bartalone) 5,718,281  Feb. 17, 1998                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                
              Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being                                                          
              indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which                                     
              applicant regards as the invention.  In particular, the examiner points to lines 4-5 of                                            
              claim 1 and urges that the language therein is indefinite “because it is not clearly                                               
              understood what it means by the circular fins being rectangular in shape from bottom to                                            
              top” (final rejection, page 2).                                                                                                    


              Claim 1 also stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                                                   
              Bartalone in view of Mitterer.                                                                                                     


              Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by appellant and the                                                     
              examiner regarding the above-noted rejections, we refer to the final rejection (mailed                                             
              February 18, 2004) and the answer (mailed February 4, 2005) for a complete exposition                                              


                                                            2                                                                                    















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007