Appeal No. 2005-2694 Application No. 10/208,631 § 103(a) rejection of claims 1, 113 and 114, and dependent claims 2, 3, 9-13, 15-21, 56, 69-71 and 76-84, as being unpatentable over Albright in view of Grabhorn. II. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 4-8 as being unpatentable over Albright in view of Grabhorn and Burke As the examiner’s application of Burke does not overcome the deficiencies of Albright and Grabhorn relative to parent claim 1, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 4-8 as being unpatentable over Albright in view of Grabhorn and Burke. III. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim 14 as being unpatentable over Albright in view of Grabhorn and either Ito or Garcia Since the examiner’s citation of either Ito or Garcia fails to cure the shortcomings of Albright and Grabhorn with respect to parent claim 1, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim 14 as being unpatentable over Albright in view of Grabhorn and either Ito or Garcia. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-21, 56, 69-71, 76-84, 113 and 114 is reversed. 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007