Appeal No. 2006-0028 Application No. 10/435,858 THE INVENTION The invention relates to “a method for enhancing the efficiency of freighting dangerous goods” (specification, page 1). The claim reads as follows: A method of enhancing the efficiency of freight movement of dangerous goods, the method comprising utilizing wing-in-ground craft, types A or B, equipped to haul dangerous goods. THE REJECTIONS The claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being based on a specification which is non-enabling with respect to the claimed invention. The claim also stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by “TAF VIII-2 Jörg IV from Botec,” The WIG Page Datasheet no. 57 (The WIG Page © 1996-2003)(Jörg).1 Attention is directed to the brief (filed April 27, 2005) and answer (mailed June 14, 2005) for the respective positions of the appellant and examiner regarding the merits of these rejections. 1 The appellant has not challenged the examiner’s implicit determination that the Jörg reference is prior art with respect to the claimed invention under § 102(b). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007