Appeal No. 2006-0104 5
Application No. 10/055,440
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to
appellants’ specification2 and claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by appellants and the examiner. As a consequence of
our review, we have made the determination that none of the examiner’s rejections on
appeal will be sustained. Our reasons follow.
2 The specification of the present application (particularly pages 8-10) is replete
with errors and inconsistencies with regard to the reference characters as earlier stated
or assigned in the specification and also with regard to lack of correspondence with the
showing in the drawings. In the event of further prosecution, both appellants and the
examiner would do well to read the specification and correlate the reference characters
within the specification itself and with the showing in the drawings with an eye toward
correcting this problem.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007