Appeal No. 2006-0132 Application No. 09/946,627 In Northern Telecom Inc., four reports prepared as part of a military project were distributed to approximately fifty persons or organizations involved in the same project. These reports either explicitly or implicitly contain a secrecy obligation, i.e., a restrictive notice that precludes reproduction or dissemination. Northern Telecom Inc., 908 F.2d at 936, 15 USPQ2d at 1325. These reports were also housed in a corporate library accessible only to those authorized by the corporation. Id. Our reviewing court held that these reports are not “prior art” within the meaning of section 102 since no one “could have had access to the document by the exercise of reasonable diligence.” Id. By contrast, in the present case, an oral presentation on the Wanthal document was given to forty to fifty people at a “Closed Session” accessible to seemingly any and every U.S. and Canadian defense industries and employees (they should all have security credentials). Moreover, as indicated supra, twenty copies of it were said to be sold without any obligation of confidentiality and more copies were available to the interested public upon its compliance with certain government regulations. Indeed, there is no evidence in the record that the government regulations referred to in Wanthal and relied upon by the 26Page: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007