Appeal No. 2006-0132 Application No. 09/946,627 Boyce, and Sloman. The disclosures of Breuer, Abildskov, Campbell, Childress and Boyce are discussed above. The examiner appears to acknowledge that these references do not mention using the claimed over-presses. See the Answer, pages 20-21. To account for the claimed over-presses, the examiner takes Official Notice and makes factual findings relating to Sloman as provided below (the Answer, page 21): It is well known in the art when curing structural laminates to provide over-presses that are at least semi-rigid against the outer surfaces of the pre-form in order to distribute force across the outer surfaces of the pre-form. For example, Sloman discloses a method of curing a structural member by providing an at least semi-rigid over-press against the outer surface of a pre-form in order to cause the over-press to press the pre-form against the other structural assembly parts (pages 1,3). . . . The appellants do not challenge the examiner’s Official Notice or factual findings relating to Sloman. See the Brief, pages 19-20. Thus, given the above circumstances, we concur with the examiner that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to employ over-presses conforming to the shape of the outer surfaces of a given pre-form, including a generally triangular shape over-presses conforming to the shape of the outer surfaces of the pre-form of the type suggested in Breuer, Abildskov, Campbell, and Childress and/or Boyce, motivated by a reasonable 48Page: Previous 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007