Ex Parte Seth - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-0139                                                                                      
              Application No. 09/583,228                                                                                
                     26.  A tablet composition free of food effect comprising:                                          
                     a)  a core comprising from 20 to 80% by weight of verapamil and from 10 to 80%                     
              by weight of a gelling agent;                                                                             
                     b)  an intermediate coating; and                                                                   
                     c)  a coating comprising, based on the weight of the coating, from 30 to 80% of a                  
              gastroresistant polymer, and from 10 to 40% of a hydrophilic silicon dioxide, wherein the                 
              gastroresistant polymer will dissolve in the intestines while withstanding the acidic                     
              medium of the stomach and duodenum, and as the gastroresistant polymer dissolves,                         
              verapamil is released in the intestines without the influence of food intake.                             
                     The prior art references cited by the examiner are:                                                
              Morella et al. (Morella)   5,378,474     Jan. 3, 1995                                                     

              Grounds of Rejection                                                                                      
                     Claims 1-4, 6, 9-14, 19-22 and 24-50 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                       
              over Morella.                                                                                             
                     We affirm this rejection.                                                                          


              Claim Grouping                                                                                            
                     Appellant argues claims 26-50 separately from the other rejected claims.                           
              Therefore, we select claims 1 and 26 as representative of the rejected claims.  37                        
              C.F.R. ' 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (September 13, 2004).                                                           
                                                    DISCUSSION                                                          

              Obviousness                                                                                               
                     Claims 1-4, 6, 9-14, 19-22 and 24-50 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                       
              over Morella.                                                                                             

                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007